Is Bias Affecting Your Decisions?

Ever wonder how bias is affecting your decisions? It’s hard to make healthy decisions, especially these days. We have access to a ton of information. We also have access to a ton of disinformation. Bias enters the picture to add further complication.

We can carefully vet our sources, but even information from credible sources may be biased. And once we absorb information, it is subject to our own bias.

All of us are biased. Our brains use prior experience as a shortcut to form a perception of reality in the moment. If bullets have pelleted my home in a drive-by, my perception of the sound of gunfire may be quite different from someone who has only heard that sound at a gun range. Or, if I’ve only heard gunshots on TV, I may perceive a gunshot outside my home as a car backfiring.

We often remain unaware of our biases or those that have long persisted within our culture. This is as true in healthcare as it is in other areas of life.

For example, you may have had a health professional recommend a low-fat diet to improve heart health. This sounds logical, reasonable, and is a widely issued recommendation. It is easy to assume that research backs up this advice. And yet, that’s not the case.

According to a study published in 2015, a relationship of causation between fat consumption and coronary heart disease was never established. In spite of that, guidelines for fat consumption were established as if causation had been established. The guidelines were included in the 1977 McGovern report and persist in many doctors’ practices today.

Bias in policy and decision making has been on daily display during the pandemic, resulting in a mishmash of barely discernible pieces of fact-based guidance. In fact, public health guidance has been such a nightmare to navigate that I’m not going to try to decipher it here.

Instead, let’s focus on personal bias. Here are a few things to watch for when attempting to determine whether bias is influencing a decision:

Judging Yourself – Judging yourself may prevent you from recognizing bias. It can be difficult to isolate personal bias if you judge all bias as bad. Remember, bias assists your brain with processing information quickly. We are wired for this. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t interrupt the circuit. Some bias creates real harm. Still, having bias is not, in and of itself, inherently evil.

Feelings of Danger – There is no real danger in questioning beliefs. Questioning is how we progress and grow, but when we hold a belief so closely it feels like part of our internal workings – part of what makes us, us –  it can feel dangerous to question that belief. If we look too closely, we may find our sense of reality shaken. It can feel better in the moment to turn away from danger rather than face potential bias.

Lack of Perspective – Without perspective, we may not be able to turn an issue around to observe whether our view is informed, balanced, fact-based, or reasonable and whether it affects us in a positive or negative way. Further, we may not be able to see the effect our position on an issue has on others. It is hard to gain perspective from the middle of something. That’s why we have the cliché – you can’t see the forest for the trees. We must sometimes invent a way to increase distance from an issue so we can see it more clearly.

Defending the Status Quo – Discovering personal bias requires internal examination. Sometimes when we feel uncertain, we ask for another person’s opinion. External observations may be helpful when exploring the layers of a belief but substituting another’s opinion for your own assessment won’t necessarily result in ferreting out bias. In fact, relying on someone else’s opinion of your process or position may tempt you to defend the status quo.

Allowing the Past to Prevent Progress – Bias is often defended overtly and tacitly by explaining that we do things according to tradition or the way they’ve always been done. Using the past to determine the future can feel grounding and safe. And there’s no denying it’s important to learn from the past. But holding onto beliefs just because they’ve been around a long time and are widely accepted can perpetuate unhealthy bias and prevent progress.

Human nature urges us to present ourselves in the best light. Discovering bias in our beliefs and/or actions may require some detective work. It can also help us determine whether bias is influencing our decisions.

Ultimately, recognizing and eliminating bias can lead to healthier life.

The Best Supplement May Be A Grain of Salt

When it comes to your health, the best supplement may be a grain of salt. I’m currently participating in a pilot program at the local medical school in which patients meet with researchers to learn about the research process and how we can participate beyond being research subjects. The program is fascinating. It gives us a glimpse into current trends in medical thought, and it makes us highly aware of the limits that plague medical research, the most frequent being time and money.
salt
Limited time and/or money usually lead(s) to smaller studies. Smaller studies are less representative of the population as a whole and thereby less definitive. Studies get published in medical journals, and along the way some ideas take hold in the medical community. Sometimes these ideas are incorporated into standard medical care even when there’s little evidence to support their clinical relevance.

A recent example of this is the practice of testing vitamin D levels when patients report malaise, fatigue or other nonspecific complaints. According to the CDC, the number of blood tests for vitamin D among Medicare recipients increased 83-fold from 2000-2010 and 2.5-fold from 2009-2014 for those with commercial insurance. At the same time, labs performing these tests started reporting normal levels of 20 to 30 nanograms vitamin D per milliliter of blood as insufficient.(1) As a result, many healthy people began to believe they had a deficiency.
fish oil
When numerous studies over the past decade linked low levels of vitamin D to cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, the millions who believed themselves to be deficient began, or were advised, to consume vitamin D supplements. I am one of those who received such advice after routine blood work. The problem is that the existing studies do not provide widely accepted evidence that vitamin D is helpful in preventing or treating these diseases. In fact, current evidence suggests that the main beneficial effects of vitamin D supplements relate to conditions of the muscles, bones, and joints.

And the vitamin D deficiency movement isn’t the first physician advanced idea based on insufficient evidence. Last year, newly issued dietary guidelines removed the restriction on cholesterol consumption because “it is now acknowledged that the original studies purporting to show a linear relation between cholesterol intake and coronary heart disease (CHD) may have contained fundamental study design flaws, including conflated cholesterol and saturated fat consumption rates and inaccurately assessed actual dietary intake of fats by study subjects.”(2)

And the possibly well-intentioned, oft repeated advice to add multivitamins to your regimen because they will make you healthier turns out to be false as well. A growing body of evidence suggests that multivitamins offer little to no health benefits. A study published in the December 17, 2013 issue of the journal Annals of Internal Medicine found that multivitamin and mineral supplements did not work any better than placebo pills.
test tube
We tend to regard science as infallible or research as indisputable. It’s not. We only know as much as we know in this moment. Our knowledge base will always be growing. Today’s theories will sometimes be proven wrong. Some studies will be statistically significant, but clinically irrelevant. Many studies will have too narrow a focus, too small a sample, or too short a term for the results to be taken as definitive on their own.

As patients, we are vulnerable to misinformation bombarding us from corporations that create supplements, food, and medications. Unfortunately, we are also vulnerable to imperfect science and bias within the medical community. To some degree this is unavoidable. This is where a grain of salt can come in handy. Skepticism can lead you to seek additional information.

If you are not medically trained, you cannot assume you know more than your doctor. You can, however, recognize that you have the final word regarding your healthcare. You have every right to ask questions with the expectation of a well-supported, forthright answer. You have the right to your health records. You have the right to seek a second opinion or a third. A second doctor may interpret your test results in a different manner than the first.

And barring an emergency situation, I’ll posit that you have a responsibility to yourself to remain skeptical regarding treatment recommendations until you become well-informed. That being said, the best supplement available for healthcare may be a grain of salt.

Disclosure of Material Connection: I have not received any compensation for writing this post. I have no material connection to the brands, products, or services that I have mentioned. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

1)https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/10/health/vitamin-d-deficiency-supplements.html?_r=0
2)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19751443
https://people.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/Ec101/JudgementUncertainty.pdf
http://www.medlabme.com/magazine-issues/2016/diagnostics/vitamin-d-assays/
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2016/01/07/new-dietary-guidelines-remove-restriction-on-total-fat-and-set-limit-for-added-sugars-but-censor-conclusions/
http://annals.org/aim/article/1767855/vitamin-mineral-supplements-primary-prevention-cardiovascular-disease-cancer-updated-systematic