Walk A Mile

Before you judge someone, walk a mile in their shoes.

When I hear this, my first thought is, I hope they’re comfortable and stylish ‘cause that’s what I require in shoes. But to the subject at hand, it’s a good admonishment to be reminded that everyone’s burden is different and not all wounds are visible.

Some of us take this admonishment to heart. We go so far as to put ourselves into the shoes of our most difficult family, friends, or co-workers before holding them accountable for the hurt or chaos they cause us. This feels like an appropriate, compassionate approach.

We imagine the fear our cousin will feel if we refuse to fund their project in spite of their failure to repay our previous loans. We feel the devastation our parent will feel if we cut off connection even though their drinking is out of control. After all, we’d feel devasted if our children no longer wanted to connect with us. We feel the hurt a sibling will feel when we won’t let them live with us because they bring dangerous people home with them in spite of our request for them not to. Often, this stops us from maintaining good boundaries.

So should we walk in someone else’s shoes?

Yes, it’s a helpful exercise. The problem with the above scenarios is they aren’t describing walking in someone else’s shoes at all. They’re describing us imagining the offender walking in our emotional shoes.

In other words, yes, we would feel afraid, devastated, or hurt in the situations we imagine. But someone who is willing to take advantage of us, betray us, or disrespect our boundaries may not have the same emotional landscape we do. They may not feel their actions are at all problematic and the resulting damage to our relationship may not phase them.

It’s hard to get your mind around the idea that a parent might not care whether they ever see us again or a brother would allow someone who would hurt us into our home. It changes how we see people who we’d like to believe care for us. Of course, we expect them to have a similar point of view. But they may not.

Having the perspective and courage to work through complicated relationships is not easy. It can take significant support and years of peeling back layers of memories and feeling. But making sure that you don’t project your point of view onto someone else can make the process go faster.

Believe behavior more than words. Observe body language that doesn’t match what is being said. Take note of unreliable behavior, manipulation of facts, outright lies, and attempts to convince you how you feel is invalid. These are all clues that your experience differs from the other person’s in ways that may mean you will never understand their emotional reasoning.

And you don’t need to. You don’t have to understand why someone repeatedly hurts, betrays, abuses, gaslights, or is dishonest with you. It may be interesting or helpful, but it is not necessary to walk a mile in their shoes. It is not necessary to try to repair a relationship that hasn’t and may never exist in the way you’d hoped. It is not necessary to keep the door open.

All you need to do is set boundaries that will allow you to grow and be your best self. Those can be whatever they need to be. And you can change them if the situation or your needs change.

Withholding judgement, granting grace, and baseline human kindness are all good. Attempting to understand how someone feels is good.

Twisting yourself into a pretzel for someone who treats you with disregard is not good for anyone, even if you have walked a mile in their shoes.

ad

Agreeing to Disagree

Agreeing to disagree. Reasonable people can disagree. They can disagree on substance or tone or the most efficient way to achieve a goal. But they can’t reasonably disagree without fully understanding the other position.

If you don’t understand a position, you can have an opinion about it but that opinion is uninformed. When you are uninformed or partially informed, you simply can’t know whether you disagree. We know this to the point that have clichés about walking in someone else’s shoes before we judge.

And yet, we have become daily finger-pointing, vilifying, cancel-culturing jerks. Provocative language gains likes, friends, and followers. This encourages bad behavior and makes it tempting to give in to our baser instincts.

It feels good to compare when we receive accolades. It feels terrible to compare when we receive criticism. But chasing accolades for a particular position entrenches us at one level of understanding and prevents growth.

I distinctly remember sitting in a jury room with 11 strangers attempting to determine whether a man assaulted a policeman before stealing his car. On our first vote, I was the lone dissent on a guilty verdict.

During deliberations, I was asked whether or not I watched the show Cops and was told that if I did, I’d understand why the guy was guilty. I was also personally attacked for reading a book during a break. Of course, this criticism was mischaracterized as me reading instead of listening during testimony. These were attempts not just to disagree with me, but to try to shame or push me into a different position. They were both unpleasant and ineffective.

Then there was the jury foreman. He and I were on opposite sides of the argument, but he was thoughtful, respectful, and reasonable. We came at the same set of facts from different points of view and reached different conclusions. I’m sure we were both right on some points. Ultimately, the jury was hung. There simply wasn’t enough proof to put 4 of us beyond a reasonable doubt.

If the situation had been a conference room in which we were discussing policy, the jury foreman and I would have made complimentary team members who broadened understanding and improved the final product. We would still have needed to reach a consensus, but our disagreement would have enriched and improved the process.

And that’s the thing. Disagreement can lead to improvement. But that’s only when we begin by listening to each other. Sometimes, we may discover that we don’t disagree at all. We may just have a different style of communication or use different lingo. Other times, we’ll discover the narrowness of our own point-of-view.

Disagreement can be inspiring. It can introduce new possibilities. It can be respectful and collaborative. But that can only happen when we stop pointing fingers, vilifying, and failing to try to understand another perspective.

I am all for accountability. I understand the desire to respond negatively to ideas that go against our closely held beliefs and values. And I’m not saying that we should agree with everything. But please, for the love of all things good, can we start listening with both our ears and our hearts to each other?

We may need to see the fear behind the bluster or the manipulation behind a benevolent-appearing act. To do this can take time, active listening, and a deeper personal investment than typical posturing allows.

The past two years have made it clear that many systems are broken or on the brink of failure. It will take the input of many voices and many points-of-view to hold things together. And it will take a force of will to look reality in the face and choose to be better.

I believe it’s worth the courage and effort it takes. And I believe in order to improve, we must agree to understand – not just disagree.